Brandon354

I never said it didn't exist because i haven't heard of it i simply said i didn't know that, i'm sorry for not knowing about one aspect of games i guess just about anything i could possible say is wrong now . I did not copy and paste my answers and no one else has said anything different the only reason you haven't said something to the others is due to whose side you are on.

It looks nice and the music does fit the atmoshpere.

I actually don't have a problem with the drugs/alcohol itself I have a problem with the way people use them as many do, and do too much or do it in a public place and it causes trouble for others.

Until that day which hopefully comes I will just have to deal with the way it is and thank you, thank you.

Maybe we could call them lacerations? It has a more painful and severe connotation .

In the end no one changed there stance and both sides felt that the other wasn't listening but since the #s on each side remain the same no one has lost and no one gained anything from having argued this, maybe a new thread will be born a month from now and we will actually get somewhere.

I thought this way going to be about acquiring and losing physical traits over time such as overweight but the things you have mentioned are somewhat already in(such as carrying less and moving slower) but I could see something like having only one arm means that you can't (effectively) hold a two handed weapon.

I did provide arguments and now you bring religion into this without reason, what a great guy. Nobody's experience is ruined because that is the way they want it. Riddle me this, if they find this way of playing to be more fun how was there experience and in affect their view of PZ ruined? You have yet to provide a good argument and I have considered your arguments they just aren't valid.

On the contrary it is you who refuses to listening my friend.

That may be, but they are not suggesting that it be implemented later on they are suggesting that it stay a mod because they feel it doesn't suit the game.

Everyone else is doing the same so what was the point you are attempting to make? I am not dismissing your views (though you do appear to be dismissing mine and others) I have considered them and found this to be the most reasonable way.

I did listen it just isn't a valid point. You are the one not listening No one gets hurt and nobody's experience is ruined. Adding more options will never make a game more boring and will appeal to more people regardless of what you seem to think, and no putting an option in a game or simply having it exist does not encourage it (unless you somehow encourage playing the game on easy, normal, and hard simultaneously along with no cheats while cheating), it is simply giving the option so I don't know what you are talking about.

Those suggesting it be modded are missing the point. If it had to be modded just because a few people didn't want it in the game almost all new features would be mods instead of the devs doing anything. It does fit into the game and it is sandbox and the majority of sandbox games or sandbox modes do not impose unnecessary restrictions upon relevant and wanted things. This is worth being put into the game and if you don't want it in just don't click that check box and viola everyone wins.

I've never heard those arguments and regardless of the route normal has taken over the years hard has become harder. games having better AI implemented means that in campaign and multiplayer bots are much more effective and it doesn't hurt that on hard in just about any shooter game they have near perfect accuracy combined with extreme aiming speed, and seeming to know when you are trailing them. In strategy games A.I.s often get the jump on you through rushing or if it finds out you are rushing it will turtle not that these are hard to beat if you use anti A.I. tactics (such as building a wall around their base) or if the game is unbalanced but that just shows you were not looking for a good game anyway.

Actually after giving it some more thought I am voting no, the world would just be a better place without it but I feel that way about alcohol also(when taken enough to cause drunkenness). People won't use it properly and enforceing them to is too hard so I would just prefer more strict punishment on those that do.

I put an easy option on a game does it encourage people to use it? no. people will still choose legendary/impossible/hard difficulty, and it wouldn't take them much time to implement so the no need to spend time argument is a worthless one as even you said it wouldn't take long and it doesn't weaken game mechanics and balance because even if you took every positive trait you would still not be superman not to mention that isn't what most people plan on doing if this is implemented. It doesn't spoil the experience by implementing it, It is spoiled it if people stand in the way of something worth implementing. Is it really that disturbing to just not hit a check box such as when you want to keep "proper zombies". There is no need for it to be modded when most people want it in vanilla and it doesn't hurt those that don't want it and they could ignore it with ease.

That is what i was getting at in my post above, would have been nice to have seen that and just say I agree

Okay but if it is going to be that way I would prefer a warning moodle that doesn't have any negative effects like when you start to become hungry or thirsty (so you know it is coming and you have a chance to reverse it before it affects you) I don't think it would be unrealistic as like you said it builds over time so i wouldn't just wake up imbalanced one day without prior warning that I was falling off the edge of sanity.

I did't vote because my answer isn't that simple. If it was up to me I would outlaw anything that has a negative impact on your health or behavior in public (being drunk, smoking, etc.) or against your children but I could care less if you get drunk/high/smoke in your own home without affecting anyone however that would be hard to enforce so... *sigh* I honestly don't see a huge difference in someone drinking non stop or smoking everyday and I just don't care as long as what you do doesn't have a negative impact on me or others but since alcohol is legal I guess why not legalize it.

the default would be them grabbing it constantly, if you were to put your hand out would a zombie only occasionally grab it? no it would whenever it gets the chance and a zombie can't tell that the shield isn't a part of you. They don't grab your weapon because it moves too frequently and too fast (well, they might try) as oppose to a shield that moves very little and so would require little effort.

not true there are many different forms of zombie lore and each movie depicts them differently even if they attempt to base it off the same one. Shields would get you killed and tire you out. if you are blocking a zombie who is pulling/leaning on you then you aren't in a position to deal a fatal blow

I don't own any apple devices so I can't take a look at the game, but is it similar to temple run?

Like i said before this isn't out of intelligence it just happens due to them doing this, and telling me to watch a zombie movie... That is a horrible way to back yourself up.

I lived in Kentucky when I was growing up and I could use a rifle, handgun, and shotgun by 13. It isn't hard to do and it certainly isn't uncommon there. I could reload fast too after only using a gun a few times so the reload time shouldn't be crap just because you are starting out. Once you know which way the bullet points it is pretty simple and quick to do. Edit: I do agree with the accuracy being high though as it seems like head shots are fairly common for someone just starting out

I'm not putting a rotting, smelly head near my house that could attract the wrong people (regardless of their intentions being friend or foe) but if you want to I don't see why not.