DictatorWolfeye

Sounds like an awesome server! I'll definitely want to try it out when it's up.
 
I have this dream of creating a survival camp out of a neighborhood, like block one in, and everyone has their own gardens in their backyards and stuff; kinda like Woodbury, from the Walking Dead. Haven't found a good server where I can accomplish this, however. 

I was just saying how cool it'd be. Plus, I've played on other large servers where survivor camps have been established so it's not impossible or 'unenjoyable.' I understand your point, however. It would be difficult to defend, but it's fun to try, even if it doesn't last long.

This is pretty much what I'm saying.
 
Also, you're wrong on one thing: Choosing anatomical sex is not an agenda, point of view, or fallacy. There is no in between, aside from, once again, birth defects such as having abnormal chromosomes that cumulate in androgyny. There's nothing wrong with being androgynous, just like there's nothing wrong with having 6 toes, brown eyes, or being colorblind. Just because it exists is not a reason to add it to the game. Gender, on the other hand, is left solely to the whims of the player in PZ as is. This is a bare bones character creator. Asking for something as highly specified as this in a game with such simple characteristics, in this regard, is pushing an agenda.
 
Further, having sex (for pleasure or procreation), having children, rape, and the like are all on the list of confirmed no's. In a game that makes no attempts to deal with sexuality in any way whatsoever, saying (or implying) that it's "part of the problem" just because it wants to happily ignore some of the more controversial topics floating around is a really negative standpoint in my opinion.
 
This is slightly off topic, but I find the idea that the whole world and everything in it needs to be a billboard for every cause is distasteful to me. Perhaps there is a place for exploring this concept in video game media, but acting like it's the responsibility of every video game to push for change- of any sort- is wrong. Just like poetry, prose, architecture, song, paintings, sculpture, and every other form of art, it should be up to the creator whether they want the piece to be an expression of self, pure entertainment, or present some moral or value. I find it every bit as wrong as censorship to tell an artist that they must force a lesson on their audience.