Kurruk Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 I think that the bag that is not worn on back should have it's weight reduction lowered. You are more likely to easily carry the same amount of weight on back, than in hand. It can be a static value taken off it across the board or a percentage of the reduction. In case of BHB 80% that can be lowered by 20 or 25% (60% in each case when carried in primary/second slots). In case of SB 60% that would be 40% or 45% rendering it around the same as plastic bag, but with higher capacity. It could potentially be changed the other way around - any baggage that can be carried on back has it's weight reduction increased. That would require modifying the base value on each of them. Spicyroots 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jela331 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewok Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Yup. Makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spicyroots Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 Makes sense. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talksintext Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Suggested this also, I think. Got booed because "it's just a game". Still think it's a good idea. You have a tradeoff: be heavily overloaded but still able to carry as much as when it's on your back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daec Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now