Rathlord Posted September 5, 2015 Share Posted September 5, 2015 I have my doubts about honeydew and watermelon being very very good representations of the human skull when it comes to blades. Snaiper said that they were similar to coconuts. I can lay a knife against one of those two fruits and by simply pressing the knife sinks into it. I've cut honeydew, watermelon, coconuts, and skulls in real life on many occasions. They aren't good analogues. They may be fun to shoot at or slice up but are not even remotely close to a human skull. The only similarities are essentially metaphorical- they are hardish on the outside and softish on the inside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uberevan Posted September 6, 2015 Share Posted September 6, 2015 I have my doubts about honeydew and watermelon being very very good representations of the human skull when it comes to blades. Snaiper said that they were similar to coconuts. I can lay a knife against one of those two fruits and by simply pressing the knife sinks into it. I've cut honeydew, watermelon, coconuts, and skulls in real life on many occasions. They aren't good analogues. They may be fun to shoot at or slice up but are not even remotely close to a human skull. The only similarities are essentially metaphorical- they are hardish on the outside and softish on the inside. If you don't mind me asking when would you EVER be in those situations xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaGrey Posted September 7, 2015 Share Posted September 7, 2015 I think we can put the melon theory down, eh? uberevan, FireOnAsphalt and CaptKaspar 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rathlord Posted September 7, 2015 Share Posted September 7, 2015 If you don't mind me asking when would you EVER be in those situations xD Shit happens. uberevan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobchaos Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 Rathlord wins all arguments in this thread on account of having more, better sourced references. Science is that simple sometimes uberevan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uberevan Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Rathlord wins all arguments in this thread on account of having more, better sourced references. Science is that simple sometimes Ah, but see, this is the true genius of Rathlord's debates. His skill is such that even if he were wrong you'd never know, because he always sounds like he knows what he's talking about. Take note kids, this is an important life skill! Rathlord and CaptKaspar 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now